Post by anik4700 on Feb 28, 2024 10:30:41 GMT
With all its circumstances. For him, the deputy, out of his free and conscious will, accused the parliamentarian of something offensive to his reputation. The minister refuted Eduardo Bolsonaro's defense thesis that the allegations were mere political opposition and were covered by freedom of opinion. In his view, the functioning of representative democracy requires respect for broad freedom of expression and opinion, but this does not prevent subsequent analysis and accountability for any insulting, defamatory and lying information. According to Minister Alexandre de Moraes, the Federal Constitution does not allow disrespect for the honor and dignity of others, nor the propagation of hate speech or ideas contrary to the constitutional order and the democratic state. In this case, parliamentary immunity does not apply (article 53 of the Constitution), as the deputy's conduct has no connection with the exercise of his function.
Furthermore, the statements were made outside the parliamentary environment and constitute offenses that go beyond the limits of political criticism, out of step with the functions and duties of a deputy. Ministers Rosa Weber (president of the STF) and Cármen Lúcia and ministers Gilmar Mendes, Luís Roberto Barroso and Edson Fachin supported this position. Parliamentary immunity The rapporteur voted to dismi Luxembourg Phone Number ss the appeal, maintaining his decision. In his view, even if spoken outside the Chamber of Deputies, through social networks, Eduardo Bolsonaro's words should be understood in the context of political dispute between the parties. Toffoli pointed out that any excesses in the performance of this prerogative must be questioned through representation for violation of parliamentary decorum in the Ethics Committee of the legislative house. Ministers Ricardo Lewandowski, Luiz Fux, Nunes Marques and André Mendonça followed this understanding. With information from the STF press office.
Supreme Court suspends judgment on amounts that make up MP subsidies José Higidio March 6, 2023, 7:52 pm AdministrativeConstitutionalpublic ministry Minister Dias Toffoli, of the Federal Supreme Court, asked to see, last Friday (3/3), the records of the trial in which the court discusses whether the allowance for members of the Federal Public Ministry and state MPs includes an additional 20% on retirement and personal benefits for carrying out management, leadership or advisory roles. reproduction Minister Dias Toffoli asked to see the files Reproduction The process has been analyzed through the court's Virtual Plenary. The request for review suspends the trial, which would continue until next Friday (10/3). The direct unconstitutionality action under discussion was filed in 2006 by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT). He questioned an excerpt from a resolution by the National Council of the Public Ministry. According to the rule, amounts received for management, leadership or advisory roles are not included in the allowances of MP members.
Furthermore, the statements were made outside the parliamentary environment and constitute offenses that go beyond the limits of political criticism, out of step with the functions and duties of a deputy. Ministers Rosa Weber (president of the STF) and Cármen Lúcia and ministers Gilmar Mendes, Luís Roberto Barroso and Edson Fachin supported this position. Parliamentary immunity The rapporteur voted to dismi Luxembourg Phone Number ss the appeal, maintaining his decision. In his view, even if spoken outside the Chamber of Deputies, through social networks, Eduardo Bolsonaro's words should be understood in the context of political dispute between the parties. Toffoli pointed out that any excesses in the performance of this prerogative must be questioned through representation for violation of parliamentary decorum in the Ethics Committee of the legislative house. Ministers Ricardo Lewandowski, Luiz Fux, Nunes Marques and André Mendonça followed this understanding. With information from the STF press office.
Supreme Court suspends judgment on amounts that make up MP subsidies José Higidio March 6, 2023, 7:52 pm AdministrativeConstitutionalpublic ministry Minister Dias Toffoli, of the Federal Supreme Court, asked to see, last Friday (3/3), the records of the trial in which the court discusses whether the allowance for members of the Federal Public Ministry and state MPs includes an additional 20% on retirement and personal benefits for carrying out management, leadership or advisory roles. reproduction Minister Dias Toffoli asked to see the files Reproduction The process has been analyzed through the court's Virtual Plenary. The request for review suspends the trial, which would continue until next Friday (10/3). The direct unconstitutionality action under discussion was filed in 2006 by President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva (PT). He questioned an excerpt from a resolution by the National Council of the Public Ministry. According to the rule, amounts received for management, leadership or advisory roles are not included in the allowances of MP members.